then vs now...
Sept 18, 2016 23:11:34 GMT
Post by m1thr0s on Sept 18, 2016 23:11:34 GMT
I occasionally run across makeshift sigils and/or spells I worked with many years ago, now covered in dust at the bottom of some old box etc. It's usually a mixed bag I experience looking over these ancient tomes...long ago replaced with better researched and better focused stuff. But there are rules governing alchemical constructs and the more experienced of my work has assimilated and mastered those rules so there are well defined reasons why they can be judged to be better than the more rudimentary steps through which my early work necessarily evolved.
I'm a theoretical physicist and I am perfectly comfortable in that role. Teaching others is something I would never have envisioned for myself and even now have split feelings about it but in those instances where I have been made aware of things not generally understood even by so called masters of the craft I feel compelled to step up to the plate where it benefits everyone, myself included. But I don't play any stupid games about it. I do not presume to be appointed by god to quash the ignorance of the herd and I was born human like everybody else and will die a human as well as I can predict such things. So I am not the Buddha or the Christ or even the Eck Master for that matter and have no religion to promote. My alchemical projection system fine tunes the Body of Light better than anything else I have personally encountered and that's reason enough to *make the matter known at the court of the King* as the I Ching puts it. There are reasons why Mutational Alchemy systems are superior to its competitors and those reasons are accessible to anyone with the will to understand them so that *belief* is nowhere required of the practitioner. What IS required is a working knowledge of the numerous parts that it draws to such as the Tree of Life, the I Ching, classical Tantra, Neopythagoreanism, modern science among dozens of contributing influences. This is why I refer to Mutational Alchemy as an *open source* spiritual alchemy and an advanced hybrid of hermetic alchemy in general.
I'm a theoretical physicist and I am perfectly comfortable in that role. Teaching others is something I would never have envisioned for myself and even now have split feelings about it but in those instances where I have been made aware of things not generally understood even by so called masters of the craft I feel compelled to step up to the plate where it benefits everyone, myself included. But I don't play any stupid games about it. I do not presume to be appointed by god to quash the ignorance of the herd and I was born human like everybody else and will die a human as well as I can predict such things. So I am not the Buddha or the Christ or even the Eck Master for that matter and have no religion to promote. My alchemical projection system fine tunes the Body of Light better than anything else I have personally encountered and that's reason enough to *make the matter known at the court of the King* as the I Ching puts it. There are reasons why Mutational Alchemy systems are superior to its competitors and those reasons are accessible to anyone with the will to understand them so that *belief* is nowhere required of the practitioner. What IS required is a working knowledge of the numerous parts that it draws to such as the Tree of Life, the I Ching, classical Tantra, Neopythagoreanism, modern science among dozens of contributing influences. This is why I refer to Mutational Alchemy as an *open source* spiritual alchemy and an advanced hybrid of hermetic alchemy in general.